Eliminate hidden regulatory
exposure in your public
sustainability claims before enforcement begins.
GLT provides independent technical oversight at the intersection of certification, regulation and public claims, a function no internal department owns.
If your company publishes sustainability claims across websites, sales decks or product materials, this review determines whether those claims are defensible before regulators, buyers or competitors challenge them.
Designed for founders, executives and legal leaders accountable for regulatory, reputational and investor risk.
In 2026, the cost of this review is typically less than a single day of legal response once an enforcement process begins.
After the Exposure Review, you will clearly know:
• which public sustainability claims are defensible as written
• which claims create regulatory, buyer or audit exposure
• what must change before enforcement, audit or challenge
What this looks like in practice
A recycled knitwear brand was publishing “100% recycled” claims across their garments. When we reviewed their GRS certification, the scope covered accessories only — not the garments themselves. The published claim was corrected to reflect what the certification actually supported: the recycled yarn input, not the finished product.
The change was made before the claim reached buyers or regulators.
Client name withheld by agreement.
From sustainability claims to audit-ready systems.
Our work focuses on audit readiness, traceability, and claim verification.
We help brands understand what they can say, what they must prove, and what auditors will actually check.
This is operational support built on real supply-chain experience — not theory or marketing frameworks.
For audit-driven cases (GRS only)
If you are under time pressure from an audit, buyer or certification request, start by confirming whether your GRS scope and claims are defensible.
100+ brands have used our GRS Scope Sanity Check